The trial was included in lurid depth, primarily by the Edmonton Bulletin, which known as it "the greatest drama ever to be listened to in an Alberta court docket". Brownlee stayed on as MLA and sought to retain his Ponoka seat in the 1935 provincial election, but was trounced by Edith Rogers of William Aberhart's Alberta Social Credit League. Edmontonians were being no a lot less enthralled than their newspaper, and many confirmed up to the courthouse early on the days of trial, hoping to get a seat. He testified that he had been if not occupied on numerous of the times that he and MacMillan experienced supposedly experienced sex in a person case, he produced newspaper stories displaying that he had been earning a speech in Stettler at a time that MacMillan experienced claimed he was forcing himself on her in Edmonton. In a different, he testified that he was assembly with O. H. Snow, the mayor of Raymond. Allan MacMillan was also named: nevertheless he testified that Brownlee experienced inspired his daughter to move to Edmonton and promised to forward details about Alberta College, he acknowledged that the leading experienced not adopted by way of and not contacted her once again until she was in Edmonton.

University of Alberta historian David Elliott has acknowledged that "Aberhart and his bring about were being also helped" by the seduction scandal. Chief Justice Lyman Duff, crafting for the bulk, acknowledged the jury's obtaining of point and, echoing Justice Clarke, concluded that the framers of the Alberta Seduction Act had not intended that destruction to a seductee be needed to be the exact as those to her father or employer (i.e. fiscal) in order to be actionable. Henry Hague Davis in dissent focussed a lot less on the concerns of legislation and additional on the evidence in the circumstance, and argued that the jury's locating of fact was perverse and that the appeal must be dismissed. Justice Clarke, in dissent, agreed that MacMillan's tale was unlikely, but expressed a willingness to defer to the jury on inquiries of actuality. Justice Lunney concurred. The court was unanimous in upholding Ives' dismissal of Allan MacMillan's action, and he did not attractiveness more. Not contented with the verdict, the Bulletin once more structured a campaign to fund an appeal, which was submitted to the Supreme Court of Canada on March 1, 1937, Ives' final decision was overturned. Smailes acknowledged figuring out at the time of MacMillan's hiring that she was acquainted with Brownlee, but denied involvement on Brownlee's portion in the final decision to hire her, whilst the janitors denied ever looking at a young lady enter the premier's office environment in the evenings. (Image: https://www.youtucams.com/1.jpg)(Image: https://www.youtucams.com/2.jpg)

The Bulletin was outraged, as was the Canadian Civil Liberties Protective Association, which identified as Ives' choice to overturn the jury's acquiring one that "established the clock back three hundred yrs". Upon the jury's return, Smith shocked them by asserting that Brownlee's counter-assert was becoming dropped he mentioned that there was no need to have to complicate the apparent cut issue of "seduction or no seduction" with evidence about a conspiracy on the component of MacMillan and Caldwell. On March 11 and 12, 1940, the committee read Brownlee's attraction. It was denied, as the committee endorsed the Supreme Court of Canada's emphasis on statutory interpretation. The court docket purchased Brownlee to fork out $10,000 in damages to MacMillan, plus trial expenditures. The foundation for damages underneath this sort of a assert was the servant's incapability to conduct her obligations to the detriment of the employer. According to Ives, even if the info experienced been particularly as MacMillan had explained, as a make a difference of regulation the plaintiffs could not declare damages with no a pregnancy or an ailment.

The basis of the claim was a two-hundred-yr-outdated tort which permitted a male to sue anyone who impregnated his woman servant. The Bulletin was a Liberal paper, and MacLean experienced supplied it an advance duplicate of his assertion of assert, which permitted MacMillan's allegations to be published and disseminated in advance of the assertion of assert was filed. Athabasca University historian Alvin Finkel has criticized Foster for getting also welcoming toward Brownlee, indicating that he does not take into consideration the scandal adequately from MacMillan's perspective. Legal historian Patrick Brode criticized this final decision, suggesting that the jury was expecting proof of a conspiracy and that, when this proof was not forthcoming, Brownlee's reliability was damage. Additional witnesses for the defence incorporated Brownlee's private secretary, Civil Service Commissioner Frederick Smailes, and 4 legislature janitors. When she determined these 4 weeks as the previous two months of April and the first two of May, Smith confirmed that Brownlee experienced been out of city for all but 10 nights of that interval.